This is a table of the known treaties and agreements concluded between the Arab states and the Zionists, represented by the United States and the United Kingdom, and of the freedoms, facilities, authorities, and privileges that these treaties and agreements provide for the use of Arab territory in the service of Zionism.
| Arab State | Known Treaties and Agreements | Privileges, Facilities, Authorities, and Services Available to Zionism |
| Qatar | United States 1. Defence Cooperation Agreement (1992). 2. Renewal and expansion of defence cooperation (2001). 3. Designation as a Major Non-NATO Ally (2022). United Kingdom 1. Defence cooperation agreements. 2. Joint air squadron. | United States: Freedom to use Qatari airspace; Freedom to use ports and territorial waters; Al Udeid Air Base, described as the largest U.S. air base in West Asia, hosting an unrestricted number of personnel, bombers, fighter aircraft, surveillance, detection, command, control, and intelligence systems. The base played an active role in the blockade, invasion, and occupation of Iraq. United Kingdom in Qatar: a. Use of Al Udeid Air Base; b. military training for British forces; c. access to Qatari airspace; d. maritime security cooperation. |
| Bahrain | United States1. Defence Cooperation Agreement (1991). 2. Designation as a Major Non-NATO Ally (2002). United Kingdom 1. Defence and security cooperation agreements. 2. British Naval Support Facility. | Bahrain is the Gulf state hosting the oldest and most visible permanent Zionist military presence in the region. United States: a. Headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet; b. Headquarters of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command in West Asia; c. Unrestricted use of ports, territorial waters, and Bahraini airspace. United Kingdom: Zionist military presence dates back to the nineteenth century because British forces were in occupation of Bahrain. Britain established a new naval base in Bahrain in 2018, its first in the Gulf since its withdrawal East of Suez in 1971. British forces enjoy freedom of military movement on land, at sea, and in the air. |
| Kuwait | United States:1. Defence Cooperation Agreement (1991). 2. Designation as a Major Non-NATO Ally (2004). United Kingdom 1. Bilateral defence cooperation. 2. Security Cooperation Memorandum (2010). | Kuwait hosts the largest concentration of Zionist ground forces in the region since the Iraqi occupation ended. United States: 1. Military camps and bases, including:a. Camp Arifjan (described as the largest U.S. ground camp in the Arabian Peninsula), b. Ali Al Salem Air Base, c. Camp Buehring, and d. Ahmad Al Jaber Air Base; 2. Pre-positioning and storage of military equipment, vehicles, and ammunition; Kuwait became the largest such centre in the Arabian Peninsula since 2003. 3. Unrestricted use of Kuwaiti airspace; unrestricted access to ports and territorial waters. United Kingdom: 1. Military training for British forces; 2. Full aviation support; 3. Freedom of naval docking and resupply. |
| UAE | United States:1. Defence Cooperation Agreement (1994), renewed in 2019. 2. Advanced Defence Partnership. United Kingdom: Defence Cooperation Agreements (2021). | The United Arab Emirates is the Zionists closest security and military partners in the Gulf. The United States receives the following benefits through its agreements with the UAE: a. Al Dhafra Air Base, described as one of the most important U.S. air bases in the region. b. Emirati ports: the U.S. Navy makes extensive use of Emirati ports, particularly Jebel Ali Port and Zayed Port. Official UAE sources describe the UAE as the most frequent overseas port of call for U.S. Navy vessels outside the United States. c. Emirati airspace: the United States enjoys unrestricted use of UAE airspace. d. Pre-positioning of equipment: the UAE permits the storage of U.S. military equipment and ammunition. United Kingdom: The United Kingdom may use Emirati military facilities for training, naval docking, aviation support, and infrastructure without charge. |
| Saudi Arabia | United States:1. Defence Cooperation and Military Assistance Agreements. 2. Updated Defence Cooperation Agreements (2025). United Kingdom:1. Military and Security Cooperation Agreement (2017). 2. Defence Cooperation Plan (2022). | United States:The agreements allow the United States to use Saudi military installations, especially Prince Sultan Air Base, which played a major role during military operations against Iraq in 1991 and 2003. The agreements provide access to Saudi airports, unrestricted overflight, aerial refuelling, and use of Saudi ports for resupply, maintenance, and operations in the Red Sea. United Kingdom: Saudi-British relations back to the establishment of the Saudi state that Britain later reinforced these relations through additional treaties. British forces benefit from military training facilities, use of Saudi territory and waters, extensive air and maritime facilities, freedom for British naval visits, refuelling, logistical support, and unrestricted transit through Saudi airspace. |
| Oman | United States:1. Military Facilities Access Agreement (1980). 2. Agreement concerning the ports of Duqm and Salalah (2019). United Kingdom:1. 2017 Duqm Memorandum of Understanding and Services Agreement, 2. 2019 Joint Defence Agreement, 3. 2022 Implementing Arrangement for the Joint Defence Agreement. | United States:The 1980 agreement granted U.S. military access to: Masirah Island,Thumrait, Khasab, andRaysut. The 2019 agreement expanded access to facilities at Duqm and Salalah. The U.S. forces benefit from: use of airports and air bases for refuelling; take-off and landing of military aircraft; storage of equipment, ammunition, and logistical supplies; docking, maintenance, and support for warships; use of ports for deployment and resupply operations; and logistical support for military transit to other regions. United Kingdom:The British presence in Oman dates back to the day British forces landed on Oman’s shores. The British role emerged before the arrival of the Americans in suppressing the Jebel Akhdar Rebellion and removing Imam Ghalib bin Ali. When Oman completed the construction of the Port of Duqm on the Arabian Sea, the English Zionists entered into an agreement granting them: Use of the Port of Duqm’s facilities by the British Royal Navy, Support and servicing for warships and submarines, Reception of British Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, Operation of the Joint Logistics Support Base (JLSB), Storage of equipment and support for naval deployment operations east of Suez. Berthing, resupply, and maintenance of naval vessels. British forces enjoy the freedom to conduct military flights within Omani airspace and to use military airfields, particularly on Masirah Island, whose strategic importance stems from its control over maritime routes in the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea. |
| Jordan | United States:1. 2021 Defence Cooperation Agreement, 2. Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) Status. United Kingdom:Defence and Security Cooperation Agreements> | United States:The Defence Cooperation Agreement formalized authorities that U.S. forces had exercised even before the agreement was signed, as was the case when U.S. forces entered Jordan during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Whoever reads the agreement as published by the U.S. Department of State can only conclude that it amounts to a complete occupation of Jordan, stripping it of its sovereignty by granting the Zionist forces the right to use the following Jordanian military sites and facilities: Muwaffaq Salti Air Base Joint Training Center Complex Jordanian Armed Forces Training Base King Abdullah Air Base Royal Jordanian Naval Base at the Port of Aqaba Jordanian Armed Forces Training Base at Quweirah King Abdullah II Special Operations Training Center Prince Hassan Air Base Border military sites King Faisal Air Base (Al-Jafr) Al-Tatn Camp King Abdullah II Air Base Land and logistical facilities:U.S. forces enjoy the unrestricted right to move their forces into and out of Jordan. Legal and administrative privileges:The agreement grants every member of the U.S. forces, or any contractor working with them, the right to enter Jordan without a passport or visa, provided they carry authorization issued by the U.S. Department of Defence! United KingdomBritish Zionist dominance over Jordan dates back to the establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan, which was created to serve as a homeland for the Palestinians after Palestine had been granted to the Jews. Since the English in Jordan are considered “the people of the house,” there is no need to elaborate on their freedom of action, because the master of the house does not make agreements with himself.. |
| Iraq | United States:2008 Strategic Framework Agreement, 2008 Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Open Invitation (Post-2011). United Kingdom:2021 UK–Iraq Strategic Partnership, 2023 UK–Iraq Strategic Dialogue, 2025 Joint Defence Statement and Defence Cooperation Agreement, 2025 UK–Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. Turkey: | The status of the Zionist forces in Iraq differs from that in the rest of the Arab countries because Iraq was occupied by the Zionists only recently. Iraq is the only Arab country to have been occupied by the Zionists twice within a hundred years. The American, British, and Arab Zionists came in 2003 to occupy Iraq and abolish the state that the Zionists had first established in 1925. There is no point in examining the contents of the so-called 2008 Agreements, because the reality of the Zionist presence in Iraq was revealed by the situation that emerged after 2011, when the collaborators in Baghdad invited the Zionist forces to operate in Iraq without the need for a formal written agreement, under the pretext of confronting “ISIS.” No one truly knows the scale of the Zionist presence in Iraq in terms of the number of troops, their locations, or their equipment and assets. However, even those collaborators in Baghdad do not deny that the Zionists enjoy complete freedom of movement in Iraq’s airspace, territorial waters, and land as happened when Iran was attacked from Iraqi airspace and Zionist forces moved from Camp Arifjan in Kuwait to Al-Tanf Garrison on the Syrian border without even notifying Baghdad. Turkey, an active member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), has maintained a Zionist military presence in northern Iraq for years. This is part of the Zionist project aimed at carving off as much Arab land as possible. Turkey claims to have ambitions in Iraq on the pretext that Mosul is Turkish, as if it and the lands of Diyarbakir were not Arab land before the Turks arrived in Anatolia. |
| Morocco | United States:1. Military Cooperation and Training Agreement, 2. Designation of Morocco as a Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA). United Kingdom:1. 2025 Permanent and Enduring Strategic Partnership Agreement. | Morocco provides extensive military cooperation to the Zionists, including training, military exercises, and the use of facilities. Participation in the large-scale “African Lion” exercise. Morocco grants the Zionists freedom to use U.S. bases, airspace, ports, and territorial waters. United Kingdom:The two countries signed a 2025 treaty to establish the foundations of a permanent agreement that formalizes cooperation that has existed between them for centuries. The United Kingdom benefits from:Long-term defence cooperation, Security partnership in counter-terrorism, Naval and intelligence cooperation, Use of Moroccan airspace, Joint training/ |
| Egypt | United States:1. Military Assistance Agreement, 2. Strategic Military Partnership. | United States: The military relationship between Egypt and the Zionists since the departure of Gamal Abdel Nasser has been based on a strategic partnership framework, military cooperation, transit facilitation, training, and joint exercises. The Zionists in Egypt benefit from the following: 1. Use of Egyptian military bases and sites; 2. Freedom to use Egyptian airspace; 3. Use of Egyptian coasts on the Red Sea and the Mediterranean to maintain Israel’s ambitions |
| Syria | United States:There are no formal treaties or agreements between Syria and the Zionists. Turkey: | United States:Since 2011, the Zionists have occupied Syrian territory east of the Euphrates River, from Al-Hasakah to “Al-Tanf” on the Iraqi–Jordanian border. The Zionists have been stealing Syrian oil in eastern Syria since 2012. The Zionists move their forces freely between the occupied parts of Syria and Iraq, whenever and wherever they wish. Turkey also occupies a border strip with Syria, and fully occupies Idlib province, with full Zionist support from Europe and Russia. |
| Tunisia | United States:The United States designated Tunisia in 2015 as a Major Non-NATO Ally. | United States:The Zionist forces enjoy limited privileges and authorities in Tunisia regarding:Use of Tunisian airspace, Use of Tunisian ports for docking and resupply, Security and intelligence cooperation. |
The presence of the Zionists in the Arab world is not a matter of “separate bases,” but rather a distributed functional network. Most Arab countries share in providing a presence that enables the Zionists to benefit from Arab land, airspace, and waters in ways that are fundamentally contrary to Arab national security.
From the above table, what Arabs provide to the Zionists can be summarized as follows:
- Air command: All Arab countries grant the Zionists access to their airspace, with Qatar being particularly notable in this regard.
- Naval command: Every Arab state with a coastline grants the Zionists freedom to use ports and territorial waters, with Bahrain being particularly notable.
- Logistical services: Most Arab countries provide logistical support to Zionist forces free of charge, with Kuwait being particularly notable.
- Flexible support: All Arab countries support Zionist forces when required, with the UAE and Oman being particularly notable in this service.
- Ground operations: Several Arab countries provide significant support for Zionist ground movement and transit, with Kuwait, Iraq, and Jordan being particularly notable.
- Training: The Zionists benefit from training areas across various terrains, with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia being particularly notable in this regard.